Most Americans are aware that the U.S. economy and markets are more frequently and deeply affected by global developments than was the case even a generation ago. Yet when global shocks occur they still somehow manage to be a bit of a surprise. Over the past two months the United States has been rocked by two shocks that have been global in scope: The sharp rise in the dollar, and the equally sharp fall in oil prices. Neither event, of course, is necessarily unwelcome. A strong dollar means imported goods and vacations abroad are cheaper, and lower energy prices have the same effect on consumers’ spending capacity as a tax cut. But the shocks may complicate economic policymaking in coming quarters, and is likely to require a bigger adjustment on the part of producers and exporters than they had anticipated.
Both the rise in the dollar and the fall in oil prices, of course, are partially domestic in origin. The stronger dollar is the result of monetary policies in the United States that are out of synch with those in Japan and Europe. The Fed began quantitative easing (QE) — the provision of massive amounts of liquidity to the financial system through large-scale bond purchases — at the peak of the financial crisis in November 2008. After three QE programs that resulted in $4.5 trillion in asset acquisitions, the Fed concluded that the U.S. economy no longer needed the support of extraordinary monetary stimulus and began tapering its bond purchases in February 2014. It halted the purchases altogether in October. Now the Fed is preparing the ground for its first Fed funds rate hike since summer of 2006. Japan and Europe, whose economies have alternated between tepid growth and recession since 2008, began their QE programs much later. Japan’s experiment with QE began after the election of Prime Minister Shinzō Abe in late 2012; the European Central Bank (ECB) launched its QE program in January 2014. Both the Bank of Japan (BoJ) and the ECB are seeking to avoid price deflation and meet their official 2% inflation targets.
Exhibit 1: Bond yields have diverged
With the Fed no longer easing and the BoJ and ECB still buying massive quantities of bonds, long-term rates have diverged across regions (Exhibit 1). Once the ECB started charging banks for their deposits, nominal yields on German government bonds fell sharply, and have turned negative up to maturities of seven years. Yields on Japanese government bonds, which have been one percent or lower for years, have stayed low. The result has been a flow of capital into U.S. dollar-denominated assets, including U.S. Treasury bonds, that has driven up the value of the U.S. dollar sharply relative to the yen and the euro.
Exhibit 2: The yen and the euro have plummeted
The plunge in oil prices, meanwhile, can be likened to a trifecta: It is the combination of weak global demand — especially in developing countries, the increase in supply from shale oil production in the United States, and OPEC’s decision to not cut production. The consensus among analysts is that oil prices will recover by the end of this year to the $70-$80 per barrel range once production cuts in the United States start in earnest. That bounce-back in prices, however, is not a foregone conclusion.
Exhibit 3: Commodity prices in a free-fall
The fall in oil prices has led analysts to re-examine their earnings estimates for energy companies, but it is the rise in the dollar that has led to the biggest revisions. Companies in several sectors now obtain a large portion of their revenues from overseas sales; for the energy, information technology, health care, and materials sectors it is over 50%. A stronger dollar can affect stock prices in two ways. First, it translates into a lower value for revenues earned in foreign currencies. This translation effect is normally small because multinational companies are skilled at hedging and typically operate and fund themselves in a variety of currencies, such that gains in some currencies offset losses in others. Anecdotally, however, the speed at which the yen and euro — and some emerging market currencies as well —declined relative to the dollar this time caught many firms off guard. Second, a strong dollar can have a potentially much larger impact on corporate earnings in that it reduces the competitiveness of exports sold abroad. This effect typically takes longer to play out. Analysts likely differ in how they sort out these two effects, but the result is clear: Analysts expect large-cap U.S. companies to show their largest quarterly decline in earnings in 1Q 2015 since 2009.
Exhibit 4: Consensus earnings estimates for the S&P 500
About the time the dollar began its sustained rise on a trade-weighted basis last fall the market began differentiating among U.S. companies based on their exposure to a higher dollar. Since last fall the more globally-oriented sectors of the S&P 500 (those obtaining over 50% of their revenues from abroad) have underperformed the more domestically-oriented sectors. Other things being equal, in coming months investor sensitivity to overseas exposure is likely to work in favor of small-cap U.S. companies, which tend to sell less abroad.
Exhibit 5: Consensus earnings estimates for the S&P 500
*Consumer discretionary, consumer staples, financials, Industrials, telecoms, and utilities.
**Energy, health care, information technology, and materials.
The rise in the dollar and fall in oil prices has already had an impact on Fed policymaking, and is likely to in coming months as well. At its March 17-18 meeting the Federal Open Market Committee (the Fed’s policymaking body) took out language in its statement stating that it would be “patient” regarding the pace at which it would normalize interest rates. But the members of the FOMC at the same time reduced their forecasts for future economic activity. The market interpreted this as evidence that the stronger dollar and low inflation expectations — which are greatly conditioned by oil price movements — have given the FOMC some leeway in the timing of its first rate hike since 2006.
Exhibit 6: Oil prices and inflation expectations
The Fed funds futures market sees some probability of a rate hike in June, but a greater probability that the FOMC will hold off until September. Overall, the futures market has been skeptical of the Fed’s hints that it would normalize interest rates rapidly, and has been pushing out the date of any rate hikes for the past year. The market has apparently seen more weakness in the economy than the Fed.
Exhibit 7: The futures market’s forecasts of future rate hikes
The economic outlook: sorting it all out
Despite the recent turmoil in foreign exchange and commodity markets, forecasters remain fairly upbeat about the prospects for the global economy. Last year Europe barely grew at all and Japan was in recession. But the consensus among economists is that economic activity in both regions will pick up in response to the QE undertaken by their central banks. The United States, despite a much slower-than-usual recovery from the last recession, has been the fastest growing economy in the developed world. The consensus believes that will continue.
Exhibit 8: Recent growth and consensus forecasts
In general, we concur with the consensus — while acknowledging that the economy and the markets face substantial downside risks. This view is based on a positive outlook for consumer spending, which has picked up in the past two years and stands to benefit from lower gasoline prices, and business investment, which has lagged in this recovery but is growing at twice the pace of the rest of the economy nonetheless.
Exhibit 9: Consumer spending and business investment are holding up in the United States
Residential investment has shown signs of softness as of late, but should recover before long. Low nominal mortgage rates and rising house prices mean that the real interest rate that homeowners face is negative — something that has stimulated housing starts and sales in the past.
Exhibit 10: Historically low real mortgage rates have stimulated housing starts
One sector that has not been a source of stimulus to the economy, meanwhile, has at least ceased to be a drag on GDP growth: government. Total government spending, defined as Federal plus state and local government expenditures, declined from 3Q 2009 through 1Q 2014, but has since stabilized. The lack of stimulus from government spending was one reason the Fed engaged in quantitative easing; that rationale for continuing to provide the economy with extraordinary monetary stimulus is now gone.
Exhibit 11: Government spending and Fed holdings of securities
The only major component of GDP that is likely to subtract from growth in 2015 is the external sector. Although lower oil prices and a greatly reduced dependence on foreign oil mean a low oil import bill, the stronger dollar is bound to dampen export growth. The reduction in net exports, however, will not be enough to offset the more favorable outlook for the domestic economy. Overall, the outlook is for real GDP growth that should be close to 3% in 2015 — substantially above the Congressional Budget Office’s 2.3% estimate of trend growth for the U.S. economy.
The risks to this outlook are that several of the factors that have deterred global growth in recent years could once again come into play. Europe and Japan could slip into deflation (though QE makes this unlikely) and their weakness could constrain growth elsewhere in the world, especially in the emerging markets. The effects of the strong dollar and weak commodity prices could also be more deflationary than the consensus expects, and U.S. growth could disappoint yet again. Finally, renewed disagreements about fiscal policy in an increasingly polarized Washington could once again lead to a return of market volatility. While these risks cannot be ruled out, they are not our baseline case for how events will unfold.
For some time now our main investment thesis has been to expect moderate growth in the United States — better than elsewhere in the developed world — and an eventual normalization of interest rates. We see no reason to depart from this view, though the outlook for the rest of the world is brighter today than in years past. In light of these views we continue to favor U.S. stocks over international stocks. Within the United States we favor more domestically-oriented companies, which for us means increasing the allocation modestly to small-cap stocks. The growing likelihood of Fed rate hikes means we recommend keeping duration short and favoring corporate bonds over U.S. Treasuries — a stance that should minimize the pain of higher interest rates. Finally, as always we recognize the virtue of diversification, and continue to believe that alternatives provide an attractive vehicle for mitigating unforeseen volatility.
Prepared by: Brian Gendreau
This information is compiled by Cetera Investment Management
Summit Brokerage Services is a member of Cetera Financial Group, RCS Capital Corporation’s (NYSE: RCAP) retail investment advice platform.
This blog and website are for informational, educational and discussion purposes only, and the owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. Summit Brokerage Services, Inc., Summit Financial Group Inc., and any of their affiliated entities and principals are not a law firms or an accounting firms, or substitutes for an attorney or accountant. Although topics may be discussed on this blog that may involve legal, accounting, or investment issues, nothing on this blog shall be deemed to constitute the practice of law, legal advice, investment advice, and/or tax advice. Summit Brokerage Services, Inc., and its affiliates do not, and cannot provide any kind of advice, explanation, opinion, or recommendation about possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies. The content on this blog is “as is” and carries no warranties. You should consult an experienced professional regarding tax consequences of specific transactions.
No reader should act in reliance on anything discussed in this blog without prior consultation with a licensed professional who is qualified to evaluate the reader’s individual facts and circumstances and offer an informed professional opinion with respect thereto. If any reader takes action or makes decisions based solely on the information on this blog without prior consultation with a qualified, licensed professional, the reader does so at his or her own risk and agrees that Summit shall have no liability resulting from such unilateral action or decisions by the reader.
Summit makes every effort to provide accurate and truthful information in its posts on this blog, but in no way expressly or impliedly warrants or guarantees the accuracy of its postings and/or the information posted here by others. All information is believed to be from reliable sources, however we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.
About Cetera Investment Management
Cetera Investment Management LLC provides passive and actively managed portfolios across five traditional risk tolerance profiles to the clients of financial advisors, who are affiliated with its family of broker-dealers and registered investment advisers. Cetera Investment Management is part of Cetera Financial Group, Inc., which includes Cetera Advisors LLC, Cetera Advisor Networks LLC, Cetera Financial Specialists LLC, and Cetera Investment Services LLC.
About Cetera Financial Group
Cetera Financial Group is the retail advice platform of RCS Capital Corporation (NYSE: RCAP) that delivers the benefits of scale to its family of independent broker-dealer firms and registered investment advisers while providing a framework that nurtures relationships, unique cultures and unbiased objectivity. As the second largest independent financial advisor network in the nation by number of advisors and a leading provider of investment programs to financial institutions, Cetera Financial Group provides award-winning wealth management and advisory platforms, comprehensive broker-dealer and registered investment adviser services, and innovative technology to its family of broker-dealer firms nationwide.
Through those firms, Cetera Financial Group offers the stability of a large and well-capitalized broker-dealer and registered investment adviser, while serving independent and institutions-based financial advisors in a way that is customized to their individual needs. Cetera Financial Group is committed to helping advisors grow their businesses and strengthen their relationships with their investor clients. All of Cetera Financial Group’s broker-dealer firms are members of FINRA/SIPC. For more information, visit ceterafinancialgroup.com.
No independent analysis has been performed and the material should not be construed as investment advice. Investment decisions should not be based on this material since the information contained here is a singular update, and prudent investment decisions require the analysis of a much broader collection of facts and context. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. The opinions expressed are as of the date published and may change without notice. Any forward-looking statements are based on assumptions, may not materialize, and are subject to revision.
All economic and performance information is historical and not indicative of future results. The market indices discussed are unmanaged. Investors cannot directly invest in unmanaged indices. Please consult your financial advisor for more information.
Additional risks are associated with international investing, such as currency fluctuations, political and economic instability, and differences in accounting standards.
Affiliates and subsidiaries and/or officers and employees of Cetera Financial Group or Cetera firms may from time to time acquire, hold or sell a position in the securities mentioned herein.