What’s Your Five? Study Suggests Advisors need at least Five Methods for Communication with their Clients

In the ever-growing world of technology, client communications have become more of a challenge for independent financial advisors. The reason isn’t because it’s difficult to find a way to communicate with clients, but because there are so many options, it is difficult to determine what advisors should be doing with their clients. As an advisor, ask yourself the following questions regarding communications:

Five Methods for Communication with Clients

Study Suggests Advisors need at least Five Methods for Communication with their Clients

  • What channel should I use for communication?
  • Are in-person meetings best?
  • Where should I meet?
  • Are phone calls preferable?
  • Is an email better than a phone call?
  • How do I fit in one-to-many communications like newsletters and social media?

In a recent study of the Association of Financial Advisors – Connecting with Clients[1] it suggests one-on-one meetings are still the preferred form of communication for clients. However, there are a lot of different preferences regarding the various aspects and details of communications. The location of the meeting is more important than one might think. Some clients prefer a more informal meeting location, from time to time. Additionally, clients don’t always want a traditional meeting, where the subject matter is all business. Some clients prefer different mediums such as email, phone calls or other communication methods. Not surprisingly, to mix it all up, layered on top of all these variables are differences in communication preferences amongst Baby Boomer, Generation X, and Generation Y clients. In addition to these challenges, the study reinforces several significant concepts surrounding effective client communication, including the correlation between client communications and increased client satisfaction, retention, and referrals. Additionally, and more surprisingly, the more communication channels you use, the higher the client’s satisfaction. The study divides the different types of communication available to advisors into two broad categories: One-to-one personal communication with clients (meetings, email, phone calls), and one-to-many communication (newsletter, social media). Generational Differences Starting with one-to-one communication, there are some differences in communication preferences across the generations. Meeting in-person is the leading preference among all generations, but there is no particular preference for the type of meeting. Overall, communication by email was the most desired communication method, more than any other meeting type, including at advisor’s office, at the client’s location, or an informal meeting. Regarding the meeting types, this is where the substantial generational differences take place. Both Generation X and Y’s preference for formal meetings at the advisor’s office was half that of Baby Boomers. Generation Y showed a strong preference for informal catch-ups. Unexpectedly, all groups showed a preference for email communication over telephone calls. In fact for Generation X, they love emails more than any other type of communication, including meetings. Conversely, as a primary communications medium, none of the generations (even Gen Y) preferred texting or video meetings via Skype.

Preferred One-to-One Client Communications

Source: http://www.afa.asn.au/documents/item/392

As for one-to-many communication, more generational differences emerged in the study. Generation Y preferred digital/social media communication as a one-to-many tool. Beyond social media, Generation Y also had a strong preference for electronic newsletters as a second alternative and, not surprisingly, they didn’t like to receive anything printed including newsletters. Furthermore, even though Baby Boomers preferred printed materials, it still isn’t substantial, with less than 20% preferring this method.

Preferred One-to-Many Client Communications

Source: http://www.afa.asn.au/documents/item/392

  Why Advisors Should Focus on Communications Based on the AFA study, the advisors who were good at delivering client communications also had the most satisfied clients and, consequently, received more referrals from them. In addition, the volume of client communication channels has a correlation to client satisfaction. The magic number of communication channels is five and, once you add more, the law of diminishing returns starts to appear.

Client Satisfaction Scores
Source: http://www.afa.asn.au/documents/item/392

What does it All Mean?

  1. There is a clear “more is better” relationship with client communication. The more communication channels you use with clients, the more you improve your client satisfaction. The survey suggests targeting five, while five+ may add more to the client’s experience, the benefits start to diminish.
  2. Have a varied one-to-one communication channel mix. Advisors rely too much on formal meetings at the advisor’s office and phone calls. Instead, utilize informal catch-ups and email.
  3.  You must have at least some one-to-many communication such as a newsletter or social media. All generations confirmed the amount being done was less than preferred. If you’re not using Marketing Library or American Lifestyle magazine as one of these communications methods, you should, they are extremely effective.
  4. Advisors extending their client base should be mindful to broaden their communication channels, as well. Especially Generation Y clients, who demand and expect communication on a broader range of communication channels. Even though there was a strong preference for Generation Y to want more social media, they still want one-on-one meetings and emails.
  5. Despite all this information, client meetings are still the most preferred method of communication.

At the end of the day, make sure you use a combination of at least five different communication channels made up of both one-to-one and one-to-many. If you want ideas for adding the most effective client communications, please contact myself at 561-338-2698/ rcrowe@summitbrokerage.com or Ria Jernberg, Director of Practice Management at 561-338-2663/ rjernberg@summitbrokerage.com. For more information on Summit Brokerage Services, an independent broker-dealer, visit www.joinsummit.com or contact us at (800) 354-5528.

 

This blog and website are for informational, educational and discussion purposes only, and the owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. Summit Brokerage Services, Inc., Summit Financial Group Inc., and any of their affiliated entities and principals are not a law firms or an accounting firms, or substitutes for an attorney or accountant. Although topics may be discussed on this blog that may involve legal, accounting, or investment issues, nothing on this blog shall be deemed to constitute the practice of law, legal advice, investment advice, and/or tax advice. Summit Brokerage Services, Inc., and its affiliates do not, and cannot provide any kind of advice, explanation, opinion, or recommendation about possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies. The content on this blog is “as is” and carries no warranties. You should consult an experienced professional regarding tax consequences of specific transactions. No reader should act in reliance on anything discussed in this blog without prior consultation with a licensed professional who is qualified to evaluate the reader’s individual facts and circumstances and offer an informed professional opinion with respect thereto. If any reader takes action or makes decisions based solely on the information on this blog without prior consultation with a qualified, licensed professional, the reader does so at his or her own risk and agrees that Summit shall have no liability resulting from such unilateral action or decisions by the reader. Summit makes every effort to provide accurate and truthful information in its posts on this blog, but in no way expressly or impliedly warrants or guarantees the accuracy of its postings and/or the information posted here by others. All information is believed to be from reliable sources, however we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. Summit may, on occasion, post links to information maintained on other websites. Such links and the information thereon are not under Summit’s control.  The mere appearance of a link to a third party site does not mean that Summit has undertaken a review or approval of the link and/or its contents.  Readers must treat information from third party links at the reader’s own risk, and Summit accepts no liability with respect to such third party information. Please note that the third party’s privacy policy and security practices may differ from Summit Brokerage Services, Inc., Summit Financial Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries’ standards. We assume no responsibility for nor do we control, endorse or guarantee any aspect of your use of the linked site.

Stay Connected

Personalized Industry Newsfeed For You

Thank you. You are now subscribed.

Close